THE TRAITOR’S TALE
from Margaret Frazer takes the reader from contemporary 21st century
times of industry and democratic governments to the medieval age of
15th century Europe - specifically
England of the year
1450.
Henry VI is
king. Rebellions are breaking
out. Cade’s Rebellion has consumed
London with anarchy, which is where our story
begins.
Simon Joliffe rides into the
city searching for Matthew Gough, a prized captain from
England’s war with
France.
He has come in response to Gough’s word that something in the
man's possession is something the duke of York, in whose service Joliffe stood, would
find worthwhile to own.
A letter, written
by an unknown ‘Robert James’, purports with ferocity to have witnessed varied
events involving the dukes of Sommerset and Suffolk, and their handling of the
war with France – specifically the
loss of Normandy. Sir William
Oldhall, who dispatched Joliffe to London to find Gough, sends him off
again. This time he is in search of
Suffolk’s steward, priest and secretary. Suffolk, himself, is dead, killed by a band of
marauding pirates. Gough is
dead. Will Joliffe find any of
these men alive? Or is someone
deliberately targeting the people in order to conceal the truth behind James’
assertions?
Elsewhere Dame
Frevisse, a nun to St. Frideswide, has been summoned by the duchess of
Suffolk, the duke’s widow and also Frevisse’s
cousin. She is in fear of her life
and that of her young son. She
believes her husband, whom she despised as much as the people he was meant to
govern, was deliberately murdered for what transpired in
Normandy.
Thus, her cousin’s support is desperately
needed.
What I found so utterly fascinating about THE TRAITOR’S TALE is
the rich texture of the narrative Frazer manages to weave in and out of the
plot. The weight of that age is
clearly felt as Joliffe, Frevisse, and the duchess’s man, Vaughn, travel from
one location to the next. The dirt
of the roads, the thickness of the forests surrounding them, the simple medieval
aire of the towns resonates with no effort. The setting is superbly
set.
This
characteristic can also become a drag to the advance of the book's plot,
unfortunately. Any person not
versed in English history, or even basic geography, might feel a bit bogged down
by the places and people mentioned and visited. Frazer offers a lot for anyone to
imbibe. It is the
characters who make the story worth the endeavor.
Joliffe, a maverick who was known by more than
one name, showcasing the various aspects of his actual personality, was heroic,
and yet earthy, in a realistic way.
There was an organic sense to him that took the bigger-than-life aspects
and made the man feel real.
Frevisse, who was inherently capable on her own, reflected on this
through her own introspection. She
wanted nothing more than to be faithful in her service to St. Frideswide; and
yet, here was a cancer (rebellions and conspiracy) spreading across her
country. The king was weak. Anarcy abounded. Riotous crowds were murdering as if war
had broken out in every township; and the wisp of that taboo word treason floated like the thin grace of a
breeze underneath and through it all.
In my view, this made THE TRAITOR’S TALE more than just a simple
'mystery' where a crime is investigated and solved. What I read involved the breakdown of a
country's governing factions through the lust of a few individuals stealthily
vying for power. One might call this Tom Clancy of the 15th century.
I only wish there had been more action to
carry the plot forward. Too much
time was taken amongst the major players extrapolating on the events of the
plot. It should have unwound as the
characters themselves discovered it, rather than the lengthy discourses in place
here.
0 comments:
Post a Comment